Teaching Trigonometry Based on Realistic Mathematics Education and Game-Based Learning Approach

Authors

  • Nguyen Tien Da Hanoi Metropolitan University
  • Do Diep Anh Hanoi Metropolitan University
  • Pham Thi Chau Giang Hanoi Metropolitan University
  • Phung Phuong Dung Hanoi Metropolitan University
  • Dang Bui Khanh Linh Hanoi Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v5i2.2173

Keywords:

Game-Based Learning, Realistic Mathematics Education, Trigonometry, Understanding

Abstract

Trigonometry, often perceived as abstract and challenging, can hinder its potential to equip students with crucial mathematical skills. We propose a novel approach—"RME-GBL"—integrating Game-Based Learning (GBL) through engaging games with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) for contextualized learning. This study investigates the combined impact of GBL and RME on 9th graders' understanding and problem-solving abilities in trigonometry. This study assesses the effectiveness of "RME-GBL" in enhancing conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills compared to traditional methods by employing a pre-test/post-test design with a control group. After the treatment applied in the experiment, the student learning group (N=30) with RME-GBL experienced an improvement in conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills, with their average scores significantly differing from the control group, indicating the effectiveness of the applied method or intervention. The results also showed that students in the RME-GBL group were more confident, more engaged, more motivated, and had a better conceptual understanding compared to traditional teaching methods. This research holds the potential to unlock new avenues for making trigonometry learning more captivating and effective for 9th graders.

References

Giardino, V. (2018). Manipulative imagination: how to move things around in mathematics. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 33(2), 345. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.17871

Habsah, F. (2017). Developing teaching material based on realistic mathematics andoriented to the mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10199

Hasanah, R. N. M., & Andayani, S. (2022). The effect of educational game in mathematics learning: A review. Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 080019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108406

Hosseini, Z., Mehdizadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). Using GeoGebra in Teaching Geometry to Enhance Students Academic Achievement and Motivation. Innovare Journal of Education, 10(3), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2022v10i3.44792

Hui, H. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students’ cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105806

Hutmacher, F., & Kuhbandner, C. (2018). Long-Term Memory for Haptically Explored Objects: Fidelity, Durability, Incidental Encoding, and Cross-Modal Transfer. Psychological Science, 29(12), 2031–2038. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618803644

Krawec, J. L. (2014). Problem Representation and Mathematical Problem Solving of Students of Varying Math Ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412436976

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Aspects of Problem Solving. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice (1st ed., pp. 87–101). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_5

Mesa, F., Salas, L. A. A., & González, G. J. R. (2023). Exploring Trigonometric Treasures: A Dynamic Approach to Teaching the Sine and Cosine Functions Using Realistic Mathematics Education and GeoGebra - A Case Study. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 50(7), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.7.24

Montague, M., Krawec, J., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2014). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle-school students of varying ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035176

Novak, M., & Schwan, S. (2021). Does Touching Real Objects Affect Learning? Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09551-z

Pesare, E., Roselli, T., Corriero, N., & Rossano, V. (2016). Game-based learning and Gamification to promote engagement and motivation in medical learning contexts. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0028-0

Pouw, W. T. J. L., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An Embedded and Embodied Cognition Review of Instructional Manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9255-5

Slyman, S. (2024). Acumenous Game-Based Learning in Simulation Games: Transforming Fears of Mathematics and Statistics Education. Taylor & Francis.

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Tran, T., Nguyen, T.-T., & Trinh, T.-P.-T. (2020). Mathematics Teaching in Vietnam in the Context of Technological Advancement and the Need of Connecting to the Real World. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.14

Trung, N. T., Thao, T. P., & Trung, T. (2019). Realistic mathematics education (RME) and didactical situations in mathematics (DSM) in the context of education reform in Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012032

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 713–717). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

Yifan, Y., Gopalan, V., Supli, A. A., Kumaran, S. R., & Alnagrat, A. J. A. (2024). Enhancing Primary School Students’ Motivation in Mathematics Through Game-Based Learning (GBL). In S. E. Bibri, A. Visvizi, & O. Troisi (Eds.), Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (pp. 261–271). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52303-8_19

Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0204847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847

Zolkower, B., Bressan, A. M., Pérez, S., & Gallego, M. F. (2020). From the Bottom Up—Reinventing Realistic Mathematics Education in Southern Argentina. In International reflections on the Netherlands didactics of mathematics (pp. 133–166). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20223-1_9

Downloads

Published

2025-03-11

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Mathematics Education: Psychology, Teaching, Curriculum, and Technology

Section

Original research

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nguyen Tien Da, Do Diep Anh, Pham Thi Chau Giang, Phung Phuong Dung, Dang Bui Khanh Linh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License