Google Scholar Citation
Information
For Readers
For Authors
For Librarians
Collaboration with
User
Counter View
ISSN Barcode
Supported by
Indexed by
Recommended Tools
Open Submissions
Indexed
Peer-Reviewed
Open Submissions
Indexed
Peer-Reviewed
Open Submissions
Indexed
Peer-Reviewed
Accept Submission | The manuscript would be suitable for publication in its current form (after copy-editing and proofreading). |
Revisions Required | The manuscript could be suitable for publication after the author(s) have responded to the reviewer's comments and made changes where appropriate. These changes could include referencing another work or a rewrite of a few sections. The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made. Articles sent back to the author for revisions must be returned to the editor without delay. Revised articles returned more than 3 weeks will be considered as new shipments. Revised articles can be sent to the editor via the Online Submission Interface. |
Resubmit for Review | The manuscript could be suitable for publication after the author(s) have responded to the reviewer's comments and made changes where necessary. These changes could include redoing experiments or a substantial rewrite of several sections. The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however. The reviewer can request a review after the author has revised the article. |
Resubmit elsewhere | The manuscript is not suitable for the journal it was submitted to, but the content is good and could be suitable for a different journal. |
Decline Submission | The manuscript is not suitable and it should not be considered further. The submission will not be published in the journal. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Contribution to Editorial Decisions | Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. |
Promptness | Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. |
Confidentiality | Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. |
Standards of Objectivity | Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. |
Acknowledgment of Sources | Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. |
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest | Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. |
Reporting standards | Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. |
Originality and Plagiarism | The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. |
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication | An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. |
Acknowledgment of Sources | Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. |
Authorship of the Paper | Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. |
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest | All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. |
Fundamental errors in published works | When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. |
Google Scholar Citation
Information
For Readers
For Authors
For Librarians
Collaboration with
User
Counter View
ISSN Barcode
Supported by
Indexed by
Recommended Tools
![]() |
Journal of Instructional Mathematics |
![]() |
The published article in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |