Unveiling the Relationship of Zoomer Generation Learning Preferences and Mathematical Conceptual Understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v7i1.2716Keywords:
Gen-Z, Mathematical Conceptual Understanding, PreferencesAbstract
This study aims to know relationship between Gen Z's mathematics learning preferences and their ability to understand mathematical concepts. The research method used a quantitative approach with a correlational study design. The research population consisted of 199 eighth-grade students at MTs Baitul Makmur, and through simple random sampling, a sample of 34 students. The instruments used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique employed was the product-moment correlation test. The research results indicate that: (1) Gen Z students prefer learning in pairs (70.52%) and asking questions directly to the teacher (69.99%) while passive methods such as rewriting (51.17%) and listening to recordings (52.64%) are less preferred as they are considered less effective; (2) Gen Z students are fairly good at using mathematical steps (approximately 69.11%), but still struggle to understand the key aspects of the concepts (60.29%), so Gen Z students understand how it works more than its meaning; (3) There is a significant relationship between learning preferences (X) and mathematical concept understanding ability (Y), with a correlation coefficient of 0.629, thus falling into the category of a strong relationship. The coefficient of determination of 39.43% indicates that learning preferences contribute moderately to students' conceptual understanding ability.
References
Aprilyani, D., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Brand Image terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Perbankan BCA dengan Trust sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 3994–4005.
Azizah, W., & Purwanti, R. (2023). Meningkatkan Aktivitas , Motivasi Dan Keterampilan Menulis Simple Present Tense Menggunakan Model Lecture Pada Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Konseling, 1(3), 598–607.
Findell, B., Swafford, J., & Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
Mariah, S., Hesline Palandi, E., & Soeparwati. (2025). Building Gen Z work character through the among learning system in vocational education. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 2(13), 306-315. https://doi.org/10.29210/1153400
Mufidah, A. B., Sulasteri, S., Majid, A. F., & Mattoliang, L. A. (2019). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Aljabar Pada Mata Kuliah Aljabar Linear Elementer Analysis of Concept Understanding in Elementary Linear Algebra. Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v1i1.11247
Ningrum. (2023). Preferensi Pengusaha Muda Kota Bandung Dalam Keputusan Memilih Bentuk Asset: Emas, Saham dan Deposito. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrieb.v3i1.1803
Noviyanti, R., Mariana, N., & Wiryanto, W. (2025). Critical thinking skills in mathematics learning through a differentiated learning approach in the era of independent curriculum: Systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(3), 856-865. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1453
Nurhangesti, M., & Seruni. (2024). Faktor-Faktor Pemahaman Konsep Matematika: Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 2(12), 2-10.
Nursyabani, W., Patmawati, H., & Santika, S. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari preferensi metode pembelajaran daring. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 6(2), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v6i2.8674
Oktavia, W., Asmara, A. S., & Suparman, T. (2025). Differentiated instruction strategies to improve mathematics learning outcomes in elementary school. Journal of Honai Math, 8(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v8i2.588
Rukmini, A. (2020). Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dalam Pembelajaran PKn SD. Workshop Nasional Penguatan Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Dasar SHEs: Conference Series, 3(3), 2176–2181.
Saputra, A. (2020). Pendidikan dan Teknologi: Tantangan dan Kesempatan. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 3(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.24014/ijiem.v3i1.9095
Skemp, R. R. (2012). The psychology of learning mathematics: Expanded American edition. Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019a). Metode Penelitian Kuantatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019b). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Syahrizal, H., & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Jenis-Jenis Penelitian Dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jurnal QOSIM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 1(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v1i1.49
Telaumbanua, E. D. P., & Harefa, A. R. (2024). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.873
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maharani Maharani, Mutia Mutia, Anisya Septiana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License






