Improving Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Trigonometry Material Using the Flipped Classroom Model

Authors

  • Abdul Hakim Ma'ruf STKIP Kusumanegara
  • Ageng Triyono STKIP Kusumanegara
  • Muhammad Rifki Ismail SMA Negeri 1 Pedes Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v4i2.1896

Keywords:

Classroom Action Research, Flipped Classroom, Mathematical Problem Solving

Abstract

This research was motivated by the relatively low learning outcomes and problem solving abilities of class IX students. So this research aims to improve learning outcomes and improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The objectives were achieved through the classroom action research method by applying the flipped classroom model for 3 cycles in trigonometry learning. This research involved 32 students from SMA N 1 Pedes. Data was collected using test instruments, observation sheets, and interviews. Data were analyzed using the Miles & Hubberman method. The results of the analysis show an increase in learning outcomes and an increase in mathematical problem solving abilities. The increase in learning outcomes is shown by the average value in cycle I of 67.28, cycle II of 72.97, and cycle III of 75.41. The percentage of mathematical problem solving ability from cycle I was 47%, increasing in cycle II to 71.87%; and in cycle III it was 84.37%. Thus, student learning outcomes have reached the specified criteria of 74, and meet the criteria for the percentage of problem solving ability set at 80%. So the application of the flipped classroom model can be recommended for further use in mathematics learning, especially trigonometry.

References

Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Disposisi Matematika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Putra Juang dalam Materi Peluang. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62

Arikunto, S. (2021). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bumi Aksara.

Alifah, F. N. (2019). Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran Afektif. Tadrib: Junal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 5(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v5i1.2587

Almerico, G. M. (2014). Building Character through Literacy with Children’s Literature. Research in Higher Education Journal, 26, 1-13.

Bossé, M. J., Lee, T. D., Swinson, M., & Faulconer, J. (2010). The NCTM Process Standards and the Five Es of Science: Connecting Math and Science. School Science and Mathematics, 110(5), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00033.x

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Act of Discovery: Understanding Children. MSS Educational Publishing Company.

Cholilah, M., Tatuwo, A. G. P., Rosdiana, S. P., & Fatirul, A. N. (2023). Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Satuan Pendidikan Serta Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Abad 21. Sanskara Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 01(02), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.58812/spp.v1i02.110

Dewey, J. (1916). Method in Science Teaching. General-Science Quarterly, 1(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730010101

English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem Solving for the 21st Century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 263–290). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_27

Fahrurrozi, M., Mohzana, M., & Murcahyanto, H. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Guru Kelas. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI), 4(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2146

Freeman-Green, S. M., O’brien, C., Wood, C. L., & Hitt, S. B. (2015). Effects of the SOLVE Strategy on the Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12054

Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2017). Facilitating and bridging out-of-class and in-class learning: An interactive e-book-based flipped learning approach for math courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 184-197.

Kemendiknas. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa: Pedoman Sekolah. Balitbang Puskur.

Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-Model Pembelajaran. Fondatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.441

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020

Nugraha, A., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear. Journal on Education, 01(02), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i2.45

Nurafifah, L., Nurlaelah, E., & Usdiyana, D. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Osborn untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v1i2.21

Nuridayanti, N., Muryaningsih, S., Badriyah, B., Solissa, E. M., & Mere, K. (2023). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal on Teacher Education, 5(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31004/jote.v5i1.16957

Pardimin, P., Rochmiyati, S., Wijayanto, Z., & Supriadi, D. (2020). A Needs Analysis of Flipped Classroom-Based Mathematics Learning Model. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(5), 69–93.

Rachmawati, A., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4(4), 835-842. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.835-842

Rohmatulloh, R., & Nindiasari, H. (2021). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1877

Rokhman, F., Hum, M., Syaifudin, A., & Yuliati. (2014). Character Education for Golden Generation 2045 (National Character Building for Indonesian Golden Years). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1161–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.197

Saputra, M. E. A., & Mujib. (2018). Efektivitas Model Flipped Classroom Menggunakan Video Pembelajaran Matematika terhadap Pemahaman Konsep. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i2.2389

Setiana, N. P., Fitriani, N., & Amelia, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Trigonometri Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematis Siswa. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4(4), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.899-910

Threlkeld, H. (2017). Flipped Learning Understanding the Flipped Classroom through the student experience (Publication No. 58437) [Master’s thesis, University of Oslo]. Database or Archive Name. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-61150

Tunnajach, N. F., & Gunawan, G. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berbasis Kontekstual pada Materi Trigonometri Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Math Locus: Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.31002/mathlocus.v2i1.1467

Warsita, B. (2018). Strategi Pembelajaran Dan Implikasinya Pada Peningkatan Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknodik, 13(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v13i1.440

Widiyono, A., & Millati, I. (2021). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Merdeka Belajar di Era 4.0. JET: Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v2i1.63

Widyasari, S. F., Masykur, R., & Sugiharta, I. (2021). Flipped Classroom: Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 4(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v4i1.171

Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian Students’ Perceptions of Flipped Classroom: A Case Study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079

Downloads

Published

2023-11-29